Dear
Father Amaro:
I am Catholic
and I go to church regularly. I started liking a Muslim girl
and she has great faith in Christ. My problem is that, she
was married and her marriage was annulled because she had a
spine injury that her parents had hidden from the Muslim
man. She was hurt badly because of his words and they agreed
to have their marriage annulled. Currently she is alone and
I want to marry her. My parents are totally against this and
are ready to the extent of cursing me to hell. Will I be
committing adultery if I marry her? She believes in Christ,
but was worried how we Christians react to her, she is
afraid to get converted. I am so deeply wounded by what my
parents have said. They call her a prostitute. Is this God
love? I am worried and I am losing faith. I am afraid of God
now. I wanted to marry her and keep her happy. Even if she
is not able to bear a child. I thought we can adopt one and
give someone life. But things are going to get worse.
I feel so discouraged and I am not able to pray now. I am
afraid to seek guidance from my church as I feel they would
even more humiliate me and her. I cannot bring her to my
family as both my parents are full of anger on us. Are we
sinning if we marry? Just because she was divorced due to
her illness does it make her impure? Can she still remain as
a Muslim and marry me? Her conversion will affect her
sister's lives and I don't want her to convert just for the
sake of marrying me. Please advise on this. - David
_______________________________
Dear David:
Whoa!
Whoa! You've got a mixed bag of ideas here. If
the young lady's marriage was annulled, there is nothing
holding you back in that department.
If she
believes in Christ, she will go through her own conversion
experience. And, that will overcome any familial attitudes.
Nothing can stop one who believes in Christ as Redeemer and
Savior. But in the Muslim faith, Jesus is merely a
prophet. You would have to make the commitment to
raise your children in the Catholic faith. No one will
ever force her to become Catholic.
“For this
reason a man should leave his father and mother and cling to
his wife...” That's what the Scripture tells us. It
doesn't tell us that it will be easy.
One doesn't
“lose faith.” One rejects it if one does not want Christ or
God's will in one's life. It's the difference between living
the Kingdom or Heaven or the separation of Hell.
The bottom
line is that you have to ask yourself why you would even ask
these questions. Are you ready for marriage? Aside
from loving your family, does this woman mean enough to you
to “leave” them? Maybe so. But you don't sound so
sure. Are you trying to convince yourself? If
you can't have a loving and joyful marriage without these
interferences, maybe you're not being called to marriage.
Maybe it's just tender feelings. Marriage is much,
much more. Ponder carefully. And be truthful
with yourselves. - God bless, Father Amaro
"Can
I be cremated 1200 miles from where I will be
buried and
have my burial mass at a later date?"
- Katherine
Father Amaro:
Can I be
cremated 1200 miles from where I will be buried and have my
burial mass at a later date? - Katherine
_____________________________________
Dear
Katherine:
Cremation is
allowed at this time in our history. But ashes must be
treated with the same dignity as a casket.
There are
three parts to a funeral liturgy, similar to the Easter
Triduum. It's one liturgy in three parts. First there is the
Vigil. The other two parts consist of the Mass of Christian
Burial, and the burial itself. The grave site is the
testimonial even in death of the deceased's belief in the
Resurrection. That is why a burial must take place right
after the mass.
You would not
hold a casket aside for a later date. You wouldn't place it
on your fireplace either. Neither would we do it with an
urn. We also do not split the ashes among family members,
which would amount to dismembering a body for souvenirs.
If the
cremains are to buried in a far off place, (I myself will be
buried on the other side of the country...) a mass can be
celebrated in each place. But this should be done in a
timely manner. If the mass is celebrated in one place and
the ashes are sent off to another place, the ashes should be
interred. The grave side blessing may be done later, when
all can be assembled. All should be done with dignity. This
vessel, your body, has been the temple of the Lord and
should be treated as such. - God bless, Father Amaro
I can't in
good conscience condemn gay marriage.
Do I have to stop being a Catholic?" - Kaitlyn
Father:
I am 18 years old and I have been extremely involved in my
parish my whole life. Yet, I can't in good conscience
condemn gay marriage like the Church says. Do I have
to stop being Catholic? I really don't want to, but nor can
I compromise this belief. I'm confused and I'm sorry.
- Kaitlyn
______________________________
Dear Kaitlin,
As I said to
Robert in a previous edition:
Ask yourself what married love is. In the way God
intends, it is twofold. It is “unitive” in that both
mutually and harmoniously express that love. And it is
procreative, which allows the participation of both parties
to cooperate with God's continuous creative activity.
Before this was “Sacramentally” celebrated, it was “natural
law.
Surely, these people find these behavior “sensual.” But can
it really equate to “married love?
”Homosexuality has existed in all time. No one knows
the cause. But again, to call it valid enough to be
called “valid” would be to equate “bearing false witness” or
“gossip” to intellectual conversation. It is what it is.
And surely, it is not “marriage, for in heterosexual
activity or the sperm and egg often unite to form a new life
whereas in male or female homosexual activity, it cannot.
”It may be “covered up” by publically stating that it is
something to be “proud” of. But seriously, if one were
gay and proud, one wouldn't have to hide behind heterosexual
terminology such as marriage or husband and wife” to try to
legitimize such behaviors. So, the bottom line is “No,
we cannot support such a thing as Catholics, even in the
civil arrangements.
”Having said
that, I have seen people live morally as companions and
friends who are homosexuals. I have known Christian
people who live as a household in chastity and in real love
(which would care for the soul and salvation of the other)
legitimately. In our legalistic world, I believe that
there should be some solution to establish through the
protection of law those households as I would want should I
be living with my own brother... and that isn't even
protected by law.
As far as our
behavior toward anyone, we must always consider the sin in
our lives that we struggle with. Are any of us an
exception of struggle? In my own life, I find myself
constantly bringing the same sins to the Sacrament of
Confession, no matter how I try to avoid them. I must
use that same patience and mercy that God shows me over and
over again when dealing with others who have struggles.
- God bless, Father Amaro
CATHOLICVIEW
PRIEST STAFF
"I
am a convert to the Catholic Church. What exactly is
the Filioque Clause in the Nicene Creed?
- Jacob
CatholicView Priest Staff:
I am a convert to the Catholic Church from a Protestant
background. My first introduction to the Catholic
Church came through a class I took in college over Eastern
Orthodoxy Theology. One of the key issues discussed
was that of the filioque clause in the Nicene Creed.
The way it was explained to me was that, among other things,
the Orthodox Church objected to the inclusion of the clause
because at a philosophical level it caused the Holy Spirit's
existence to be contingent on the existence of the Father
and the Son. In other words, it falls into the heresy
of subordinationism to a degree. To paraphrase a
recent explanation I heard on a Catholic radio show, there
is the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit is the love
that exists between them. The other piece was that it
was a step away from identifying the Christian Trinity and
towards trying to define the imminent Trinity. My
question, what answer has been made by the Church
historically to these charges? - Jacob
____________________________________
Jacob:
Two months ago, this
question was asked. Here is the answer given:
The Roman
Catholic Church is headed by the Bishop of Rome as its
universal pastor. Within the Catholic Church, there are many
rites, or ways of worshipping God, complete with specific
customs and even theology. The Roman rite is the largest of
the rites of the Catholic Church, but there are many. The
Western Rite, of which the Roman rite is the largest in this
section, is used by churches that grew from the Church of
Rome. The Eastern Rite is largely organized according to
national churches and apostolic churches (churches actually
founded by one of the twelve apostles) that grew
independently of the church in Rome. There are many rites in
the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. In this link,
you can see for yourself all the recognized rites of the
Roman Catholic Church:
http://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm
In regards to the Profession of Faith, called the
Creed (I believe in one God, the Father Almighty....), the
Creed was written in two parts, one in 325 A.D. simply
called the Nicene Creed (and promulgated by the Council of
Nicaea in 325 A.D.) and then, later, the clarification of
381A.D., that is called the
Niceno–Constantinopolitan Creed, promulgated by the Second
Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (381 A.D.)
All the different rites and churches (Rome, Constantinople,
Alexandria, Jerusalem, and other apostolic churches) agreed
to the wording of this Creed and agreed on this statement of
belief to be used in all liturgical settings. The Niceno
-Constantinopolitan Creed is what we use today at our Masses
and liturgical functions. The "Filioque" statement of the
Creed refers to this statement: "I believe in the Holy
Spirit, the Lord and Giver of life, WHO PROCEEDS FROM THE
FATHER AND THE SON. "Filioque
is Latin for "and the Son."
And here is the theological rub: does the Holy Spirit
"proceed" ONLY from the Father, or does the Holy Spirit
"proceed" from both the Father AND the Son, or does the
Spirit of God proceed from the Father THROUGH the Son. The
381 A.D. creed state simply, "I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the Lord and Giver of life, who PROCEEDS FROM THE FATHER."
No mention of "AND THE SON (Filioque)." So, when did this
addition come from and why the Eastern Rites (and the
Orthodox) do not use this addition, "AND THE SON." To the
Western Rite Churches, it was obvious that the Spirit comes
from the Father and the Son, for Jesus had said that He
would send the Holy Spirit, as shown in John 16:7 -- But I
tell you the truth, it is better for you that I go. For if
I do not go, the Advocate will not come to you. But if I
go, I will send Him to you." Notice that Jesus did not say
that the Father would send the Holy Spirit, as manifested on
Pentecost in the upper room, He said that He himself would
send the Spirit. The Western Church added the words, AND OF
THE SON (Filioque), to the Creed as a way to teach that
Jesus is divine as well as human, and as an argument against
the Arian heresy that was present in Spain during the fourth
and fifth century (simply put, the Arian heresy did not
recognize the divinity of Jesus). The Eastern Churches
protested stating that the church in Spain could not add
anything to the agreed upon Creed without calling another
Ecumenical Council. Here is what is written about this
conflict, copied from the article, FILIOQUE, in the
Wikipedia web site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filioque
Although the Eastern Fathers were aware that in the West the
procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son
was taught, they did not generally regard it as heretical:
[34] "a whole
series of Western writers, including popes who are venerated
as saints by the Eastern church, confess the procession of
the Holy Spirit also from the Son; and it is even more
striking that there is virtually no disagreement with this
theory."
[35]
The phrase Filioque first appears as an
anti-Arian [36][37]
interpolation in the Creed at the
Third Council of Toledo
(589), at which Visigothic Spain renounced Arianism,
accepting Catholic Christianity. The addition was confirmed
by subsequent local councils in Toledo and soon spread
throughout the West, not only in Spain, but also in the
kingdom of the Franks, who had adopted the Catholic faith in
496, [38]and in
England, where the Council of
Hatfield imposed it in 680 as a response to
Monothelitism.[39]
However, it was
not adopted in Rome.
Yet, the controversy of adding the FILIOQUE statement to the Creed grew
and was part of a host of issues (such as Papal Primacy)
that caused the split between West and East in 1054 A.D.
with both the Patriarch of Constantinople (the successor of
Saint Andrew) and the Bishop of Rome (the successor of Saint
Peter )excommunicating each other in the Western and Eastern
schism. To this day, the issue of the Filioque Statement has
not yet been resolved despite decades of dialog to heal the
rift between the Orthodox Churches and the Roman Catholic
Churches.
So, in regards to the Eastern Catholic Churches using the
Creed without the FILIOQUE statement in the Creed, they
continue to use the Creed as passed down to us from the
Second Ecumenical Council (381 A.D.). This was agreed by the
Bishop of Rome as a condition of unification of the Eastern
Catholic Churches that desired to be united with Rome. The
Eastern Catholic Churches have their own liturgical rites
and their own canon law. Yet, we are united by accepting the
Bishop of Rome as our universal pastor. One day, I pray that
Roman and Orthodox Churches will be united in faith and
love. As Saint Paul writes in Ephesians 4:5 --Striving
to preserve the unity of the Spirit through the bond of
peace: one body and one Spirit, as you were called to the
one hope of your call; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one
God and Father of all and through all and in all.-
CatholicView Priest Staff
"How can
Jesus have infinite knowledge
and finite knowledge? - Ali
CatholicView Priest Staff:
In regards to the concept of hypostatic union (Jesus is
fully God and fully man), how can Jesus have infinite
knowledge (divine characteristic) and finite knowledge
(human characteristic) simultaneously? - Ali
__________________________________
Ali:
Thank
you for your question. Your question reminds me of the
biblical verses in the New Testament that talks about Jesus
NOT knowing the day or hour of the end of time. In the
Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 24, Verse 36: "But of that day
and hour, no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor
the Son, but the Father alone." It was clear that Jesus'
human limitation existed. Jesus, as the Word of the Father
and Second Person of the Trinity, divine and human, freely
accepted human limitations to truly experience and know the
human condition. Jesus is fully divine and fully human, and
Jesus freely accepted the limitations of humanity to achieve
His Father's goal, the salvation of humankind by a human.
As sin and death entered the world through one man, Adam, so
salvation had to come through one man, Jesus Christ, as it
is written in Romans Chapter 5, Verse 17: "For if, by the
transgression of one man, death came to reign through that
one, how much more will those who receive the abundance of
grace and of the gift of justification come to reign in life
through the one man, Jesus Christ." By the Will of the
Father, Jesus had all the human limitations that we have,
that included not even knowing when the world and time was
coming to an end. Jesus freely chose for our salvation to
have his divine infinite knowledge limited by human
boundaries. Jesus was fully divine as stated in the Gospel
of John, Chapter 1: "In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the
beginning with God. All things came to be through Him and
without Him nothing came to be." This same Jesus, by the
love of the Father and the working of the Holy Spirit, took
upon Himself our human nature and its limitations, which
includes, as you put it, "finite knowledge." Now, that's
unconditional love. And I rejoice in it! Alleluia! –
CatholicView Priest Staff
"I have a
First Class Relic of St. Gemma Galgani.
Is it okay for me to privately venerate it?"
- Braedon
Father:
I
recently contacted the Passionist Order and I received a
first class relic of St. Gemma Galgani. Is it okay for me
to privately venerate it and keep it in my possession?
Thanks for your time. - Braeden
_______________________________
Braeden:
You
are blest indeed to have the first class relic of Saint
Gemma Galgani (1878-1903), an Italian mystic who had the
stigmata or the visible wounds of Christ on her body. She
was quite the witness to the Passion of Christ and had
visions of Jesus, Mary, and her guardian angel She died
young from tuberculosis. But her short life was an amazing
life of loving Jesus with every fiber of her body and soul.
As for the first class relic (a first class relic is the
actual bone of the saint), it is acceptable for you to honor
the relic in your home. You may keep it safe in your
possession. She is the patron saint of students and
pharmacists. And thinking of the future, please make sure
that the relic has a special place in your home and, at the
end of your life, make sure that the relic is passed on to
your local parish or someone in your family that will
treasure it as you do.
-
CatholicView Priest Staff
"What is
the meaning and origin of the
Sanctus Bells? - Michael
CatholicView Priest Staff:
Meaning and origin of the Sanctus Bells. I was having a
discussion with a friend who is studying Daoist philosophy
and the topic of using bells to purify and ward off evil
came up (a supernatural occurrence if you will). Many other
groups through history use the bells in similar fashion.
Indians had wind chimes and Jewish traditions I think use
the bells during or before the spirit cleansing bath. This
brought on a discussion of why do Catholics use the bells.
I have found only two reasons
1) Joyful noise to the Lord
2) Signal that something supernatural was taking place
Aaron had to wear bells on his priestly garments especially
before entering the Holy of Holies.
We ring the bells before mass. Could this be a cleansing of
the church "temple" if you will (In addition to the uses
above)?
We ring the bells during the Eucharist could this be a
cleansing of the body our internal "temple"?
Do we Catholics use the bells in any rituals for a
purifying/cleansing purpose? – Michael
_____________________________
Michael:
The
bells that are used in Mass and in other paraliturgical
functions, such as the exposition of the Blessed Sacrament
in Benediction, are rang to get one's attention to an
important part of the liturgy. When the Mass was solely in
Latin, the bells signified to the congregation that the
consecration of the bread and wine was about to take place,
and once again, that communion was being distributed. In
paraliturgies such as Benediction, the ringing of bells
signified that the blessing with the Holy Eucharist was
about to happen. The bells only meant to bring attention to
an important part of the Mass or paraliturgy. Nothing more.
Very similar to the ringing of church bells to tell people
that Mass is about to begin or to bring attention to an
event happening in the community. We as Catholics do not
use bells in any ritual for a purifying or cleansing
purpose. We are, as Christians, cleansed by the blood of
Christ. No ritual is needed for purifying or cleansing. We
are already cleansed and purified and justified by our Lord
and Savior, Jesus Christ through faith in Him alone. –
CatholicView Priest Staff
"I am doing St. Louis de Montfort's consecration to Mary
and have to give everything I own. What do I do
about the money my parents need? - Michelle
CatholicView Priest Staff:
I am doing St. Louis de Montfort's consecration to Mary and
am unsure about something. I know we are to give Mary
everything, including our exterior goods, including all our
property and assets, present and future. I have no problem
with this except my question is I give my aged parents all
my income except for a few hundred dollars for my bills and
needs, so that they can pay for their bills which are
extensive...I also live with them.....we help take care of
each other as I have several chronic illnesses.....what do I
do about the money I give my parents? I want to give Mary
everything but they need this money for their livelihood or
they will not be able to make it? Thanks so much and God
bless you!! - Michelle
____________________________________
Michelle:
I am
impressed that you have taken the consecration of yourself
to JESUS through Mary by following the prayers written for
this purpose by Saint Louis de Montfort (1673-1716). Saint
Louis was a French preacher and priest who went all over
Central Europe to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ. He
wrote extensively about the Blessed Virgin Mary which
influenced the Church's general teachings about Mary and her
role in salvation history. Saint Louis de Montfort wrote a
series of prayers called TOTAL CONSECRATION TO JESUS THROUGH
MARY, a 33 day prayer, as explained in his book, TRUE
DEVOTION TO MARY. This is what you are following.
Remember, your prayer exercise and your consecration to
Jesus through Mary is meant to bring you into a complete
union with Jesus Christ, your Lord and Savior. As to the
question about consecrating EVERYTHING TO JESUS THROUGH
MARY, you mentioned about finances and money. I believe
you have GREATLY MISUNDERSTOOD the intent of Saint Louis de
Montfort's on giving your money away.
He did not say this.
Instead, he wanted his prayer students to offer to the Lord
all their resources for God's greater glory! You are
already doing that by giving money to your aged parents!
YOU
MUST AND ARE OBLIGED
to support your parents in their need. Saint Louis didn't
mean for you to divest yourself of your needed financial
resources. Instead, ask the Lord to bless your money.
thereby consecrating it, and to allow it to be used for his
greater glory as you take care of your needs and the needs
of your parents and others in your life. Really, Saint
Louis was making this point: God has everything. What can
you give Him? There is only one thing He doesn't have
possession of
by His Will
and that is you and your free will. By giving to the
Lord your complete self in faith and in prayer (as you
are doing), you will give Him something that he doesn't have
because of His desire to protect your free will: your love
and your life. Consecrating your money to the Lord means
that you will use your money
not for
sinful reasons but for His
greater glory.
It does not mean to give everything away and go homeless and
leave your parents to be left alone. I know, by your
question, that you have already given your whole heart and
soul to the Lord, and that you have consecrated your money
and resources for His Plan and Will. And in return, the
Lord will bless you with even more resources to help your
parents and others.
– CatholicView Priest Staff
CatholicView Staff
"I am
asking for prayers for my husband who is having
open heart surgery. Would you pray for him?" - Claudette
CatholicView Staff:
I'm asking for prayers for my husband who will have open
heart surgery in 2 weeks. It's a second heart surgery and
will require bypasses and valve replacement. I'm very
worried and have been praying to God for everything to go
right and that he will be ok. Please pray that things will
go as planned with no complications. Thank you! Claudette
_________________________________
Dear
Claudette:
We, at
CatholicView will be praying for your husband's successful
recovery. Although your husband's name was not given in
your letter, we know that the Lord knows his name in His
almighty wisdom.
Here is
our prayer:
Lord, You ask
that all who are heavily burdened to come to you. Let your
compassionate and healing Hand touch Claudette's husband as
he goes into surgery entrusting You, God, for a miraculous
recovery. Dear God, I know you will be there with him
during this special time, and You count him as one of Your
own.
We pray that You
send your heavenly angels to keep watch over Claudette's
husband as he is brought into surgery.
Heavenly
Father, I ask that in your supreme mercy you
guide the
hands of the surgeon with Divine wisdom and skill, blessing
all those who minister and care for him during this hour.
We
pray that
this procedure be without complications and that your
servant's recovery will be swift and successful. You tell
us in Isaiah 41:10 "Fear
not, for I am with You; Be not dismayed, for I am Your God.
I will strengthen You, Yes, I will help You, I will uphold
You with My righteous right hand.
Let Your servant
cling to that promise that You are always with him, and will
be there for him during these times of trouble. Ease the
family's anxiety over the surgery he is facing for Your word
says that You will sustain him during this time.
All the family is
trusting in Your Word. Comfort them as they pray, for the
family will be leaning on You for strength to get through
this time. Let their worries lessen because they know You
will be there with him. We pray, if it is God's will,
for a complete and successful surgery and that he will heal
quickly.
Lord, we
pray all this in the name of our Most Precious Savior, Jesus
Christ.
- CatholicView Staff
"Other than faith is
there any proof to why I should
believe in God and Jesus? Sam
CatholicView Staff:
Other than faith is there any proof to why I should believe
in God and Jesus? Sam
__________________________________
Dear
Sam:
Many
have written in with questions wanting to know why should
they believe in the existence of God. But, you see, there
is something, a connection that pulls us, an empty place
that cannot be filled except through God and Jesus. We are
incomplete. There is a space within all of us, that
material things cannot satisfy, a longing, if you will, to
be connected to God and the Savior, Jesus Christ. It is
inborn, but through the gift of Free Will, some choose to
close their hearts to Him. Those who believe in God
accepted, through faith, because they were incomplete
without God and His Son Jesus Christ.
The
great philosopher and theologian St. Thomas Aquinas
summarized his cosmological argument in the Summa
Theologia. In this theological masterpiece, St. Thomas
writes five "ways" that we can know God exists. His first
three ways deal with the cosmological argument: (http://www.saintaquinas.com/philosophy.html)
St.
Aquinas argues that there are things in the world in motion
(this simply means that things are changing) and that
whatever is in motion must have been put in motion by
another thing in motion. Aquinas holds that, "whatever is in
motion must be put in motion by another," and that, "this
cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no
first mover." Hence St. Thomas argues that in order to
eliminate the infinite chain of motions, there must be a
first mover and source of all motion, God.
The second way is very similar to the first. It argues
that," In the world of sense we find there is an order of
efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it,
indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the
efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to
itself, which is impossible." By this he means that any
thing, circumstance or event cannot change itself, but can
only change something else (concept of efficient cause).
Since there is a string of causes in which the string cannot
be infinite (see premise #1), then all causes must attribute
themselves to a first cause: God.
The third way also argues using the notion of a chain of
causes. St. Thomas notes that things in our world owe their
existence to something else in the world. Aquinas calls this
the way of "possibility and necessity," meaning that all
things made possible, necessarily attribute their existence
to some pre-existing thing. Only God can be the source of
all things since he is a being having its own necessity and
does not need a pre-existing thing to cause him to exist.
All things existing can trace themselves in a chain back to
God.
A
second shorter version of the cosmological argument can be
formulated as:
Every
being (that exists or ever did exist) is either a dependent
being or a self-existent being.
Not
every being can be a dependent being.
So
there exists a self-existent being.
Finally, a third rendition of the cosmological argument
(extracted from the book Philosophy for Dummies by
Dr. Tom Morris):
1. The
existence of something is intelligible only if it has an
explanation.
2. The existence of the universe is thus either:
a. unintelligible or
b. has an explanation
3. No rational person should accept premise (2a) by
definition of rationality
4. A rational person should accept (2b), that the universe
has some explanation for its being.
5. There are only three kinds of explanations:
a. Scientific: physical conditions plus relevant laws yield
the Event explained.
b. Personal: Explanations that cite desires, beliefs, powers
and intentions of some personal agent.
c. Essential: The essence of the thing to be explained
necessitates its existence or qualities (for example, if you
ask why a triangle has 3 sides, I would respond that it is
the essence and necessity for a triangle to have 3 sides by
its definition.
6. The explanation for the existence of the whole universe
can’t be scientific because there can’t be initial physical
conditions and laws independent of what is to be explained.
Event the Big Bang theory fails to explain the existence of
the universe because modern science cannot explain where the
original Big Bang singularity came from. The universe as a
sum total of all natural conditions and laws cannot be
explained unless we have an Archimidean reference point
outside the system.
7. The explanation for the existence of the universe can’t
be essential because the universe cannot exist necessarily.
This is because, it could have been possible for the
universe not to have existed (if the Big Bang had been
slightly different it is possible for large-scale structures
to not have existed). Thus the universe is not something the
must necessarily or essentially exists.
8. Thus a rational person should believe that the
universe has a personal explanation.
9. No personal agent but God could create the entire
universe.
10. A rational person should believe that there is a
God.
The
Teleological Argument
The
teleological argument, or argument from design, is also
summarized by St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica.
Here is the extract from the Summa:
"The
fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see
that things that lack intelligence, such as natural bodies,
act for an end, and this is evident from their acting
always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain
the best result. Hence it is plain that not fortuitously,
but designedly, do they achieve their end. Now whatever
lacks intelligence cannot move towards an end, unless it be
directed by some being endowed with knowledge and
intelligence; as the arrow is shot to its mark by the
archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all
natural things are directed to their end; and this being we
call God."
http://www.saintaquinas.com/philosophy.html
Of course, these
three proofs have their share of proponents and opponents.
The proofs do not definitively prove the existence of God
because they can be argued. Even the greatest truth can be
masked behind a veil of innocent ignorance or blindness of
pride. It is faith that provides the bedrock for belief in
God and the cornerstone for ultimate happiness.
Nevertheless, these three proofs can help show that
Christianity is a rational religion, as well as an endlessly
controversial one.
Benedict XVI says, " No, we
cannot see Him, but there are many things that we do not see
but they exist and are essential. For example: we do not see
our reason, yet we have reason. We do not see our
intelligence and we have it. In a word: we do not see our
soul and yet it exists and we see its effects, because we
can speak, think and make decisions, etc. Nor do we see an
electric current, for example, yet we see that it exists; we
see this microphone, that it is working, and we see lights.
Therefore, we do not see the very deepest things, those that
really sustain life and the world, but we can see and feel
their effects. This is also true for electricity; we do not
see the electric current but we see the light.
So it is with the Risen Lord: We do not see him with our
eyes but we see that wherever Jesus is, people change, they
improve. A greater capacity for peace, for reconciliation,
etc., is created. Therefore, we do not see the Lord himself
but we see the effects of the Lord: So we can understand
that Jesus is present. And as I said, it is precisely the
invisible things that are the most profound, the most
important. So let us go to meet this invisible but powerful
Lord who helps us to live well.
Sam, get to know your Creator
through constant prayer. It does not matter if it is a
simple prayer for He can read your heart. Ask Him to show
you, through the Holy Spirit within you, that He is real,
that He loves you, and wants you to live with Him someday.
He will send you truth about Himself. You will know Him
personally. Keep praying. - CatholicView Staff
"My
Catholic wife is involved in an Internet Affair
and I believe it has escalated to being local. How
do I ask the Lord for help?" - Jimmy
CatholicView Staff:
I was married for many years to a dedicated Catholic
involved with Church Activities. I discovered that she was
involved with an Internet affair. She claims its over and
made vows on God's name that nothing physical happened then
or now. I feel perhaps it's still going on and may have
moved forward to being local. How do I ask the Lord for
help to either exposé it or dispel it from me? - Jimmy
_______________________________________
Jimmy:
I am
sorry to hear that you are going through such an upheaval in
your life. I think it is time to sit down with you wife and
ask her point blank if she is seeing someone. Perhaps you
are wrong about this situation. If you are sure about this,
then you might want to get help with your marital
situation.
Sit
down with your wife and discuss what you are thinking. If
your wife is seeing someone, it might be wise make an
appointment to see your parish priest who will talk to both
of you. He will give you the name of a marriage counselor
who will help you to hopefully mend your marriage. This is
important. Your priest may also ask you questions about
your own behavior to determine why your wife decided to get
involved with online dating.
Please
do not delay but call and set up an appointment as soon as
possible. And pray and ask the Lord to help and strengthen
you during this time. God go with you. -
CatholicView Staff
"Does the
Church condone Catholics to be
members of the Eastern Star?" - Tony
CatholicView Staff:
Does it violate the doctrine of the Church for a practicing
Catholic to be a member of the Eastern Star? Thank you for
your answer. - Tony
____________________________
Tony:
Masonic
organizations are irreconcilably opposed to Jesus Christ and
the Catholic Church. Every Catholic is prohibited from
joining any Masonic Order, including the Order of the
Eastern Star which is a Masonic association for women, the
Order of DeMolay which is for boys, Job's Daughters, and the
Rainbow Girls which is for young women.
There are many people who think
the ban prohibiting membership in Masonic Orders has been
lifted. That is not true. In 1917, Canon Law excommunicated
any Catholic who became a Mason, and Canon Law remains in
effect unless it is explicitly changed in more recent
promulgations. Membership in these organizations or
groups is always perilous to the Catholic Faith.
The 1983 Code of Canon Law did not explicitly remove the penalty of
excommunication.
The Congregation of the Clergy
addressed the confusion over this matter, and it did so with
the approval of Pope John Paul II when it said: The
Church's negative judgment in regard to Masonic associations
remains unchanged since their principles have always been
considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church,
and therefore membership with them remains forbidden.
Masonic
organizations are irreconcilably opposed to Jesus Christ and
the Catholic Church. Every Catholic is prohibited from
joining any Masonic Order, including the Order of the
Eastern Star which is a Masonic association for women.
Those who join
the Masonic associations are in a
state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion.
For more on this subject visit
Ask Catholics What We Believe: The Masons vs. the Catholic
Church .
Hope this
helps. - CatholicView Staff
"Could a person who
arrives late for mass take
communion? -
Lourdes
CatholicView Staff:
I have a friend that sometimes arrives late to mass, last
week when she went to receive communion and was in line, the
priest was very upset. He told her in front of everyone "
If you arrive late to mass again I am not going to give you
communion". I wonder if a priest can do that, I mean , that
he doesn't let you take communion, because you arrive late
to mass, (is there a rule about that?) and if his attitude
was rude or not, because my friend felt exposed in front of
all the people in the church. Thanks a lot for your answer.
- Lourdes
_______________________________
Lourdes:
As a
general rule, anyone who arrives after the gospel reading
and homily, in conscience, should not take communion. The
reason for this is that the gospel prepares us for the
reception of the Sacrament of Holy Communion. We must first
recognize Jesus in the Word before we recognize Him in the
Eucharist. However,
there can be mitigating circumstances such as heavy
traffic, illness in the family, a sick child who needs
emergency attention and other calamities. These are things
that can delay arrival on time and those persons should not
be denied communion.
The
late comer to mass must examine their conscience and
determine for themselves if they could have arrived
earlier. On this hinges taking communion or not. So this
must fall primarily upon the individual Catholic rather than
upon the pastor who cannot see every late arrival from his
vantage point. However the pastor has a duty to direct and
inform the consciences of the faithful entrusted to him.
The priest must be careful not to shame a latecomer at
communion itself but wait for an opportunity to speak or
inquire about that person's late comings. Hope this helps.
- CatholicView Staff
"My husband
had an affair for 9 months and I feel
his apology was not sincere. What should I do?"
- Annette
CatholicView Staff:
I am a mother of 3 and wife of 20 years. My husband had an
affair for 9 months. He planned on leaving us (his family)
however came back after much pleading.
I now realize I do not want him back like this. He has
apologized but not sincerely. I can't forgive without a
sincere, heartfelt apology. I do not want a divorce but
what is left? Annette
___________________________________
Annette:
I am
sorry to hear of the upheaval you face in your marriage.
The good thing is that your husband recognized his actions
and is trying to make the marriage work again. Remember you
have three beautiful children who need their father.
I
suggest you accept his apology, however weak, for the sake
of your marriage and your children. But you are going to
need some help. Please make an appointment with your parish
priest for a "good sit down" talk about how you should
proceed, how to regain your marriage and your own self value
back. Ask the priest about a marriage counselor. A
counselor will help you and your husband sort out the after
pain of adultery and give you the courage to move forward
toward saving and refreshing your union again.
And
don't forget to pray, asking God for the strength and
courage to mend the broken places within your marriage.
May the Lord go with you. - CatholicView Staff
"I am
divorced but drawn to the Catholic Faith. We
were not Catholic. Can I become Catholic?" - Lee
CatholicView Staff:
I am a divorced man and I am drawn to the Catholic Faith.
My ex-wife and I were not Catholic. Can I become Catholic? -
Lee
________________________________
Lee:
In
order to be baptized as a Catholic, a divorced person must
pay heed to established church regulations. A divorced
person is required to apply for an annulment.
Since the Church recognizes
both civil and religious marriages as valid, there would
very likely be a requirement to have an annulment.
Catholicism recognizes marriage as both legitimate outside
of the church and as binding for life regardless of where it
occurs.
See a
local priest about your past marriage. He will discuss this
with you and will talk to you about an annulment. He will
also suggest that you attend R.C.I.A (Rites of Christian
Initiation for Adults to begin learning about the Catholic
Faith. God bless. - CatholicView Staff
"My wife is suffering with paranoia. Can I have
another relationship?" - Shaju
CatholicView Staff:
Can a person whose wife is suffering from paranoia and who
don't allow any sex can go for another relationship? -
Shaju
___________________________________
Shaju:
I am so
sorry to hear that your wife is suffering with paranoia and
I can certainly understood your sadness. But nonetheless,
one does not exchange a wife for someone else. As a husband
you must care for your wife who is ill. You took a vow on
your wedding to her which states, "For better or worse".
You must honor that vow.
The
most important thing you can do is make an important
appointment with a specialist to get help for your wife's
paranoia. This is vital. Once her paranoia is in control,
see a marriage counselor to repair your union.
You
must not desert you wife but support her in all things until
she is well again. - CatholicView Staff
"Our priest does not engage in conversation unless
it is about sports. How can I help him be more
conversational? - Michael
CatholicView Staff:
Our priest will not engage in a conversation unless it is
about sports. I do not do sports. I like this priest's
homilies and his biblical knowledge. How can I help him be
more conversational? I am afraid we might lose him if he
can't become more pastoral. Many from the parish complain
to each other but no one seems to know how to help him. -
Michael
__________________________________
Michael:
I am
happy to hear that you do enjoy the homilies and the
biblical knowledge your priest has given his parishioners.
You are indeed fortunate to have such a priest. And
remember, each of us has our own personalities, and none of
us are perfect. No man is. You must accept this priest as
he is, as long as he does his job for God and man. This is
more important than social conversation.
Why not
invite him to your home for a family dinner? If you are
single, ask other to arrange an evening out for dinner.
Unless he is shy, he will probably open up a bit. All in
all, he sounds like a very good priest. Remember none of us
are perfect - CatholicView Staff
"I cannot find the records of my Grandparents'
marriage. Were they married in the eyes of God?"
- Molly
CatholicView Staff:
My grandparents had their marriage blessed in 1921, telling
the priest they had married civilly 10 years before, but
there's no legal record of either ceremony. Were they
married in the eyes of God, please? - Molly
___________________________________
Molly:
Do not
be concerned. Perhaps the records were lost, considering
they married in 1911. Flooding, fire damage, etc. could
have destroyed these records. Papers could have been lost
or damaged during this time. And in 1921, the technology
was different than it is today. Although the Church has
been vigilant in protecting such documents, one cannot be
certain that they are still available. But I see no need to
worry. Your grandparents had a long, loving, and married
life together, and they made sure to get their marriage
blessed in the Church. God saw this and was pleased.
Certainly the Lord looked with favor on them. When you see
your grandparents in heaven, you will be able to smile at
this needless worry. Be at peace. - CatholicView
Staff
"Please tell me whether its okay
to have a
priest as a friend?" - Sarah
CatholicView Staff:
Please tell me whether its okay to have a priest as a
friend? - Sarah
___________________________________
Sarah:
It is
fine to be friendly with a priest such as inviting him to
your home for dinner IF you are married, or occasionally
having a friendly lunch, providing you remember that he is
married to the Church and he made a vow not to be involved
romantically with a parishioner. Anything else would be
frowned upon by the Church and cause speculation by others
who know you both. - CatholicView Staff
"My Muslim girlfriend wants me to pretend I am
Muslim for her parents. What shall I do?" - Kent
CatholicView Staff:
I've had a relationship with a Muslim woman for several
years. Her family can't accept a non-Muslim and she says I
have to pretend to be Muslim. I am not a Catholic although I
pray and go to Catholic church. I can probably pretend to be
Muslim for her but I can't be intimate with her if the
marriage isn't valid. My question is: I would like to
become Catholic and I would also like to marry this woman.
What do I do?
_______________________________
Kent:
I am
sorry you find yourself in this predicament. You must be
honest about who you are. Should you lie about this, you
will have to continue with this lie, and therefore cannot
become Catholic. If you say you are a Muslim, how will you
raise your children?
Do not
pretend to be something you are not. Your girlfriend knows
what you are and claims she loves you. Do not go this route
for something that is untrue. Be honest and let things take
its course. Do not give up your faith and salvation for
anyone. Your girlfriend must decide to marry you for who
you are, and you should not succumb to telling an untruth.
It is dangerous to lie about something this important. One
day, that very lie will be found out and you will lose
everything. - CatholicView Staff
"I am in love with my spiritual director. Is it ok to
continue to see him for direction?" - Elizabeth
CatholicView Staff:
Recently I have become aware of the fact that I am in love
with my spiritual director. In response, I switched
parishes, and have not had any appointments with him in 2
months (though we have exchanged a few emails). I have been
struggling with my faith and with sensitive personal issues
that he had been helping me through, and still desperately
need his counsel and guidance. So long as he is completely
unaware of my feelings, is it really necessary to eliminate
all communication, or is it ok to continue to see him for
spiritual direction? - Elizabeth
______________________________
Elizabeth:
I am
pleased to hear that you have switched parishes since you
have these feelings for your spiritual director. You did
the right thing. To return to the parish that you left
would be foolish since you would be feeding your feelings
for this man who is unavailable to you. Better to find
someone new who will help you with your situations, without
the attraction you felt for the other.
Sadly, many women become
attached in romantic ways to those who have taken time to
help them. They become heroes.
You are doing the right
thing in avoiding this kind of closeness at this time. Be
strong and this too shall pass. I hope this helps you.
- CatholicView Staff
TO
READ PAST ISSUES OF "ASK A PRIEST" Q/A
CLICK HERE
Please
use the link at the top left side of this page
to comment or be added to the mailing list.